|
|||
|
Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Plus Colporrhaphy With a Small Intestine Submucosa Graft Versus Total Pelvic Floor Reconstruction for Advanced Prolapse: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Junyan Wang, Xiaojuan Wang, Keqin Hua, Yisong Chen
Int Neurourol J. 2019;23(2):144-150. Published online 2019 Jun 30
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5213/inj.1938014.007 |
|||
|
Citations to this article as recorded by  Evaluation of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy videos on YouTube
Cihat Özcan, Adem Sancı
International Urogynecology Journal.2023; 34(8): 1843. CrossRef Anatomic outcomes of sacrohysteropexy without posterior mesh placement in patients with asymptomatic grade 1 and 2 rectoceles: Is a rectouterine mesh really necessary?
Adem Sancı, Khaled Obaid, Murat Topcuoglu, Mehmet İlker Gokce, Evren Süer, Ömer Gülpinar
LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.2023; 15(4): 122. CrossRef Quality-of-life improvements in patients after various surgical treatments for pelvic organ prolapse
Yiqi Guan, Jinsong Han
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.2023; 309(3): 813. CrossRef Robotische Sakrokolpopexie
Pawel Mach, R. Kimmig
Der Gynäkologe.2022; 55(5): 364. CrossRef Single-center study for robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacropexies: a one-fits-all strategy for pelvic organ prolapse?
Pawel Mach, Cara Kaufold, Peter Rusch, Rainer Kimmig, Paul Buderath
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.2022; 306(6): 2009. CrossRef Robotic Sacrocolpopexy for Treatment of Apical Compartment Prolapse
Kwang Jin Ko, Kyu-Sung Lee
International Neurourology Journal.2020; 24(2): 97. CrossRef
|
