INJ Search

CLOSE


Int Neurourol J > Volume 22(3); 2018 > Article
Declemy, Chesnel, Charlanes, Le Breton, Ismael, and Amarenco: Specificity of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Neuromyelitis Optica in Comparison With Multiple Sclerosis Patients

ABSTRACT

Purpose

The aim of this study was to describe lower urinary tract symptoms in neuromyelitis optica (NMO), and to compare these data with urinary disorders observed in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.

Methods

Retrospective study of data collected from January 1997 to July 2017 using the database from a Neuro-Urology Department of a university hospital. NMO and MS patients were matched for sex, age, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)

Results

Twenty-six patients with NMO were included and compared with 33 MS patients. Mean age was 41.6 years (standard deviation [SD], 14,8), mostly female patients (24 vs. 2 males). Mean EDSS was 4.6 (SD, 1.8) in the 2 groups. In NMO group, 57% of the patients (n=15) had overactive bladder with urgency and urge incontinence and 38.5% (n=10) of them had nocturia. Voiding symptoms was observed in 69.2% of the patients (n=18); 42.3% of NMO patients performed self-intermittent catheterization versus 12.1% in MS patients (P=0.012). Low bladder compliance and severe urinary tract infections (pyelonephritis) were more frequent in NMO than in MS patients (respectively 15% vs. 0%, P=0.016 and 42% vs. 12%, P=0.024).

Conclusions

Lower urinary tract symptoms, especially overactive bladder and urinary retention, are frequent in NMO. Low bladder compliance, serious urinary infections, and high prevalence of urinary retention requiring self-intermittent catheterization are the main symptoms significantly more frequent than in MS.

INTRODUCTION

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) or Devic disease (DD) is an autoimmune inflammatory disorder of the central nervous system. NMO is considered as a variant of multiple sclerosis (MS). This syndrome was described first by Albutt in 1870 (quoted from [1]). NMO affects preferentially the optic nerves and the spinal cord and frequently follows a relapsing course with severe disabling episodes of optic neuritis and extensive transverse myelitis [2]. In 2004, a specific marker for NMO was identified, the aquaporin 4 antibody (AQP4-IgG) or NMO-immunoglobulin. The presence of AQP4-IgG in patients is associated with NMO related disorders often referred to NMO spectrum disorders (NMOSD) [3].
NMOSD is more prevalent in women than men with a sex ratio usually higher than observed in MS. The median diagnostic age is also higher than in MS, 35 MS - 45 NMO years [2,4]. Due to the treatment and prognosis differences between NMOSD and MS, it seems to be important to distinguish the 2 pathologies. The diagnosis consensus criteria for NMOSD includes at least one core clinical characteristic, a positive test for AQP4-IgG, and exclusion of alternative diagnoses [4].
Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are well known and well described in MS. The most common symptom is overactive bladder syndrome with mostly an overactive detrusor on cystometry [5,6]. In contrary, only few studies described urinary disorders in NMOSD. De Carvalho et al. [7] found a prevalence of LUTS among NMOSD patients in about 80% of the cases. The most frequent symptoms are urgency, nocturia, urinary incontinence, and voiding symptoms [8]. Furthermore, no study has compared the clinical and urodynamic characteristics between MS and NMOSD patients [7,8].
It is known that urinary complications are more serious in spinal cord injuries population [9]. Even these complications are not the main causes of mortality anymore, they are still important and need an aggressive treatment and specific follow-up [10,11]. Because severe transverse myelitis is common in NMOSD [12], it could be speculated, due to the importance of spinal lesions in the pathophysiology of bladder dysfunction, that LUTS are more frequent and more severe than in MS [13]. However, on the contrary of spinal cord injury, NMOSD is an active disease, with a progressive degradation of the functional abilities [14]. Moreover many studies have shown that the evolution of NMOSD was more pejorative than MS [15]. Because of these 2 characteristics, it seems important to evaluate prevalence, severity, urological consequences and quality of life impact of LUTS in NMOSD, in comparison with MS [16,17]. This knowledge will allow us to treat efficiently the patients.
The main aim of this study was to assess the clinical and urodynamic characteristics of urinary disorders in patients with NMOSD consulting in a Neurology department using a database. The second aim was to compare these data with those of MS patients and assess the differences between the 2 population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Design

A retrospective study was conducted: all patients with NMOSD referred for urinary disorders in a Neuro-Urology Department of a University Hospital between January 1997 and July 2017 were included. Inclusion criteria were patients with an established diagnosis of NMOSD (clinical, and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] criteria before 2005 and clinical, biological and MRI criteria after 2005). Patients with MS diagnosed according to the revised criteria of Mc Donald’s were identified [18]. Each patient with NMOSD was matched with at least 1 or 2 MS patients for sex, age, and according to the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) [19].

Variables

For each patient, clinical and urodynamic data were collected: age, sex, severity of neurological disability measured by the EDSS, and duration of follow-up. Patients were classified into 3 categories according to the EDSS: from 1 to 4, 4.5 to 6.5, and more than 7. The first group was patients with EDSS from 1 to 4, the second class with EDSS from 4.5 to 6.5, the third with 7 and more.
The symptoms existing during the first clinical evaluation were noted and divided between the storage symptoms such as urgency, nocturia, stress urinary incontinence (SUI), and urgency urinary incontinence; and the voiding symptoms (slow stream, intermittent stream, hesitancy, straining to void), the urinary treatments during the first clinical evaluation were also noted, as well as the use of intermittent catheter as voiding mode. The existence of urinary infection during the last year were searched with difference between urinary infection without fever and pyelonephritis
The urodynamic parameters from the first urodynamic evaluation were documented with: the existence of detrusor overactivity (phasic or terminal), the volume of the first involuntary detrusor contraction, the maximum intravesical pressure during the evaluation, the presence of a low bladder compliance (the compliance is calculated by dividing the volume change by the change in detrusor pressure during that change in bladder volume, a compliance=20 or less is considered as low), the cystometric capacity, the presence of a detrusor sphincter dyssynergia (DSD). During the evaluation if the patient presented a post void residual of 100 mL or more, it was considered as urinary retention.
Using an echography, the presence of vesicoureteral reflux or lithiasis, as well as a renal failure on biology, was resumed in “morphological complications.”
The urodynamic studies were performed according to “the Good Urodynamic Practice” recommended by the International Continence Society [20]. All definitions used were in accordance with the International Continence Society Report [21].

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were expressed as the mean±standard deviation (SD). Differences between groups were assessed with the Student t-test for quantitative variables and chi-square or Fischer tests for categorical variables. Statistical analyses were carried out using R software ver. 3.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) with a P<0.05 considered significant.

Ethics

This study was approved by the local ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Ile de France II: 00001072). Since it was a retrospective study, no formalized informed consent was necessary according to the ethics committee, and a letter was sent to the patients informing them that their data would be used, unless they contacted the investigators to express their disapproval.

RESULTS

Clinical and Urodynamic Characteristics of NMOSD Population

Twenty-six patients with NMOSD were included with a mean age of 41.6 years (SD, 14.8). Most of the patients were women (93.9%, n=24 patients). Only 2 patients had an EDSS higher than seven. 57.7% (n=15) of the patients had urgency, 57.7% (n=15) urge incontinence, 26.9% (n=7) SUI, and 38.5% (n=10) had nocturia. Voiding symptoms was observed in 69.2% of the patients (n=18), and 42.3% used self-intermittent catheterization as voiding mode. The duration of follow-up in NMOSD population was 8.2 years (SD, 7.8).
Nine NMOSD patients were treated by means of anticholinergic drugs (34.6%), 6 received alpha-adrenergic blocking drug (23.1%), and 2 used botulinum toxin A injections in detrusor (7.7%) in association with self-intermittent catheterization (Table 1).
Concerning urodynamic data, 12 patients had detrusor overactivity (46.1%) and the mean cystometry capacity was 356.3 mL (SD, 140.4). Ten patients had DSD (38.4%) and 4 patients (15.4%) had a low bladder compliance (Table 2).

Comparison Between MS and NMOSD Populations

Mean EDSS was 4.6 (SD, 1.8) in the 2 groups. Febrile urinary tract infection (pyelonephritis and prostatitis) were significantly higher in the NMOSD population than in MS patients (30.4% vs. 6.1%; P=0.024). Low bladder compliance was more frequent in NMOSD patients than in MS (15.4% vs. 0% P=0.016). Voiding symptoms with significant postvoid residual volume requiring self-intermittent catheterization was more frequent in NMOSD patients than in MS (42.3% vs. 12.1%; P=0.012).
A comparison between the patients with a low bladder compliance and the others, showed a significative increase of the pyelonephritis incidence in the group “low bladder compliance” (50.0% vs. 12.5%, P=0.038).
The existence of a DSD was significantly associated with the presence of voiding symptoms (87.5%, n=28, P=0.033) and urgency urinary incontinence (59.4%, n=19, P=0.743). There was not any strong association between DSD and low bladder compliance (3.4%, n=1, P=0.475) or pyelonephritis incidence (6.2%, n=2, P=0.052)
There was no other significant difference concerning clinical or urodynamic characteristics between NMOSD and MS populations.

DISCUSSION

This article is to our knowledge, the first comparing the LUTS between NMOSD and MS patients. Our results suggest a high prevalence of urinary symptoms in NMOSD especially overactive bladder syndrome and voiding symptoms. Despite the fact that NMOSD is usually described as a neurological disease very close to MS, we found important significant differences between NMOSD and MS patients. The main difference was the more importance of urinary retention and thus the use of catheterization, the high prevalence of low bladder compliance, and high incidence of febrile urinary tract infections. These characteristics suggest a higher risk of urinary complications in NMOSD than in MS patients since low bladder compliance, recurrent urinary tract infections, and postvoid residual volume are well known to lead to renal complications and failure. These data suggest the need to track down urinary disorders in NMOSD patients with a systematic proposal of a specific periodic follow-up to decrease these risks and to improve quality of life.

Interpretation of Results

The NMOSD is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects the central nervous system and which seems to be very close of MS. But in fact, there are several characteristics that differentiate MS and NMOSD:
· The evolution of NMOSD is more pejorative than MS [15].
· Some treatments used in MS, did not work on NMOSD patient [22].
· NMOSD has a lower incidence than MS [23].
As there were differences between NMOSD and MS, we supposed that urinary disorders were different in both diseases. The initial speculation was that NMOSD had more urologic complications (pyelonephritis, vesicoureteral reflux, or renal failure, …).
This supposition was based on several arguments:
· Myelitis is common in NMOSD, and it’s well known that urinary complications are more serious in spinal cord injury [9].
· NMOSD is an active disease with pejorative evolution leading to a degradation of the voiding control (on the contrary of spinal cord injury).
· NMOSD is often confused with MS, leading to lack of data on urinary disorders in this specific disease.
Our results confirm that there was more pyelonephritis and low compliance bladder in NMOSD group. These results seem to confirm that the urinary disorders are more severe in NMOSD patients than MS patients.
As we already say NMO is an active disease like MS, but with spinal injury (myelitis). In other terms, NMO combine the more serious urinary complication (because of myelitis), and the progressive degradation of neural voiding control (like MS). With this observation, we understand that we cannot applied a similar medical reasoning than MS or spinal cord injury.
We propose that every patient with NMOSD diagnosis is referred to Neuro-Urology Department event no specific urinary symptom is observed. The follow-up for these patients should be the same than spinal cord injury patients: over a 2 years period, at 6-month intervals at the beginning and then every year in order to monitor the neurological degradation. As a same way the treatment proposed needs to be more aggressive early. The treatment must be re-evaluated for each step of functional loss.

Comparison With Literature

Characteristics of our population in term of urinary disorders are similar to 2 previous studies concerning urinary function in NMOSD. The first one reported the prevalence of LUTS in a population of NMOSD followed prospectively and showed that most of these patients had significant LUTS including urgency, nocturia, and voiding symptoms. The most frequent urodynamics findings were DSD (present in over half of the patients) and overactive bladder [7]. The authors suggested that DSD was the most common urodynamic abnormality in NMOSD, in contrast with MS. On the contrary, in our study, there is no significant difference between MS and NMOSD patients concerning prevalence of overactive bladder and/or DSD. The second study was a cross-sectional study, investigating the bowel and bladder dysfunction and their impact on quality of life in 60 NMOSD patients. In this article, 78% patients reported bladder symptoms, 60% had urgency, 47% had incontinence, and 39% had nocturia. Moreover, 45% of the patients had a moderate or severe bowel problem, 79% were constipated and 23% had fecal incontinence [8]. In our study, we observed the same prevalence of overactive bladder symptoms (urgency [57.7%], urge incontinence [57.7%], nocturia [38.5%]) but voiding symptoms was more frequently observed (69.2%) than in the previous studies. Similarly, we found a high prevalence of constipation (64%).

Limitations of the Study

Nevertheless, there are some limitations in this work, the most important is the retrospective nature of this study. This retrospective nature leads to several biases, such as memory or selection biases, inducing a lack of power. Moreover because of the specialization of our department, we create a selection bias; because our patients are consulting for LUTS. However, this expertise allowed us to find a cohort of 26 patients with NMOSD, which is a consequent population because of the illness rarity, comparing to MS [24].
In conclusion, to our best knowledge, we report here the first clinical and urodynamic comparison between NMOSD and MS patients. We found a significant difference between the 2 populations, concerning the prevalence of febrile urinary infections, the importance of voiding dysfunction and urinary retention requiring the use of self-intermittent catheterization, and presence of low bladder compliance in NMO. Despite the limitations of our study due to retrospective analysis, we can suggest that the LUTS observed in NMOSD are more important than in MS and can lead to more severe complications. A further and prospective study could demonstrate a possible difference in term of efficacy concerning the specific urinary treatment.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Rebecca HADDAD (M.D., APHP), Laura WEGLINSKI (M.D., APHP), Florence BABANY (M.D., APHP), Etienne SAVARD (M.D., APHP) and Valentin COINDRAUD (M.D., APHP) for their help and assistance in data acquisition.

NOTES

Research Ethics
This study was approved by the local ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Ile de France II: 00001072). Written informed consent by the patients was waived by the Institutional Review Board due to a retrospective nature of our study.
Conflict of Interest
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION STATEMENT
· Full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis: AD
· Study concept and design: GA, AD
· Acquisition of data: AD
· Analysis and interpretation of data: CC, AD
· Drafting of the manuscript: GA, CC, AD
· Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: GA, CC, AC, FL, SS
· Statistical analysis: CC, AD
· Administrative, technical, or material support: GA
· Study supervision: GA

REFERENCES

1. Allbutt TC. On the ophthalmoscopic signs of spinal disease. Lancet 1870;95:76-8. crossref
2. Wingerchuk DM, Hogancamp WF, O’Brien PC, Weinshenker BG. The clinical course of neuromyelitis optica (Devic’s syndrome). Neurology 1999;53:1107-14. PMID: 10496275
crossref pmid
3. Lennon VA, Wingerchuk DM, Kryzer TJ, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF, Fujihara K, et al. A serum autoantibody marker of neuromyelitis optica: distinction from multiple sclerosis. Lancet 2004;364:2106-12. PMID: 15589308
crossref pmid
4. Wingerchuk DM, Banwell B, Bennett JL, Cabre P, Carroll W, Chitnis T, et al. International consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Neurology 2015;85:177-89. PMID: 26092914
crossref pmid pmc
5. Bart S, De Sèze M, Chartier-Kastler E, Ruffion A. Lower urinary tract dysfunction and multiple sclerosis. Prog Urol 2007;17:358-64. PMID: 17622059
crossref pmid
6. Amarenco G, de Sèze M, Ruffion A, Sheikh Ismael S. Clinical and urodynamic evaluations of urinary disorders in multiple sclerosis. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2014;57:277-87. PMID: 24980885
crossref pmid
7. de Carvalho FL, Gomes CM, Apostolos-Pereira SL, Bessa J Jr, Pinheiro M, Marchiori PE, et al. Voiding dysfunction in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Neurourol Urodyn 2016;35:39-43. PMID: 25212666
crossref pmid
8. Mutch K, Zhao S, Hamid S, Methley A, Elsone L, Singh G, et al. Bladder and bowel dysfunction affect quality of life. A cross sectional study of 60 patients with aquaporin-4 antibody positive Neuromyelitis Optica spectrum disorder. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2015;4:614-8. PMID: 26590671
crossref pmid
9. McKinley WO, Jackson AB, Cardenas DD, DeVivo MJ. Long-term medical complications after traumatic spinal cord injury: a regional model systems analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:1402-10. PMID: 10569434
crossref pmid
10. DeVivo MJ, Krause JS, Lammertse DP. Recent trends in mortality and causes of death among persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:1411-9. PMID: 10569435
crossref pmid
11. Ruffion A, de Sèze M, Denys P, Perrouin-Verbe B, Chartier-Kastler E; Groupe d’Etudes de Neuro-Urologie de Langue Française. Groupe d’Etudes de Neuro-Urologie de Langue Française (GENULF) guidelines for the management of spinal cord injury and spina bifida patients. Prog Urol 2007;17:631-3. PMID: 17622101
crossref pmid
12. Drori T, Chapman J. Diagnosis and classification of neuromyelitis optica (Devic’s syndrome). Autoimmun Rev 2014;13:531-3. PMID: 24424197
crossref pmid
13. de Sèze M, Ruffion A, Denys P, Joseph PA, Perrouin-Verbe B; GENULF. The neurogenic bladder in multiple sclerosis: review of the literature and proposal of management guidelines. Mult Scler 2007;13:915-28. PMID: 17881401
crossref pmid
14. Papais-Alvarenga RM, Carellos SC, Alvarenga MP, Holander C, Bichara RP, Thuler LC. Clinical course of optic neuritis in patients with relapsing neuromyelitis optica. Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:12-6. PMID: 18195212
crossref pmid
15. Ghezzi A, Bergamaschi R, Martinelli V, Trojano M, Tola MR, Merelli E, et al. Clinical characteristics, course and prognosis of relapsing Devic’s Neuromyelitis Optica. J Neurol 2004;251:47-52. PMID: 14999489
crossref pmid
16. Nortvedt MW, Riise T, Myhr KM, Landtblom AM, Bakke A, Nyland HI. Reduced quality of life among multiple sclerosis patients with sexual disturbance and bladder dysfunction. Mult Scler 2001;7:231-5. PMID: 11548982
crossref pmid
17. Vitkova M, Rosenberger J, Krokavcova M, Szilasiova J, Gdovinova Z, Groothoff JW, et al. Health-related quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients with bladder, bowel and sexual dysfunction. Disabil Rehabil 2014;36:987-92. PMID: 23962192
crossref pmid
18. McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, Goodkin D, Hartung HP, Lublin FD, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2001;50:121-7. PMID: 11456302
crossref pmid
19. Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983;33:1444-52. PMID: 6685237
crossref pmid
20. Schäfer W, Abrams P, Liao L, Mattiasson A, Pesce F, Spangberg A, et al. Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn 2002;21:261-74. PMID: 11948720
crossref pmid
21. Gajewski JB, Schurch B, Hamid R, Averbeck M, Sakakibara R, Agrò EF, et al. An International Continence Society (ICS) report on the terminology for adult neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (ANLUTD). Neurourol Urodyn 2018;37:1152-61. PMID: 29149505
crossref pmid
22. Trebst C, Jarius S, Berthele A, Paul F, Schippling S, Wildemann B, et al. Update on the diagnosis and treatment of neuromyelitis optica: recommendations of the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). J Neurol 2014;261:1-16. crossref
23. Mealy MA, Wingerchuk DM, Greenberg BM, Levy M. Epidemiology of neuromyelitis optica in the United States: a multicenter analysis. Arch Neurol 2012;69:1176-80. PMID: 22733096
crossref pmid
24. Jacob A, Panicker J, Lythgoe D, Elsone L, Mutch K, Wilson M, et al. The epidemiology of neuromyelitis optica amongst adults in the Merseyside county of United Kingdom. J Neurol 2013;260:2134-7. PMID: 23689970
crossref pmid

Table 1.
Comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics of LUTS in the 2 population
Variable MS (n=33) NMOSD (n=26) Total (n=59) P-value
Demographic characteristic
 Age (yr)c) 40.2 ± 15.8 41.6 ± 14.8 0.734
 Female sexb) 31 (93.9) 24 (92.3) 55 (93.2) 0.804
 Duration of follow-up (yr)c) 12.6 ± 10.6 8.23 ± 7.84 0.071
 EDSSa)
  <4 16 (48.5) 13 (50) 29 (49.2) 0.858
  4.5–6.5 13 (39.4) 11 (42.3) 24 (40.7)
  ≥7 4 (12.1) 2 (7.7) 6 (10.2)
 Disease modifying treatmentb) 20 (60.6) 14 (53.8) 34 (57.6) 0.862
Urinary symptomatology
 SUIa) 8 (24.2) 7 (26.9) 15 (25.4) 0.789
 Urgencya) 22 (66.7) 15 (57.7) 37 (62.7) 0.479
 Urgency urinary incontinencea) 19 (57.6) 15 (57.7) 34 (57.6) 0.992
 Nocturiaa) 17 (51.5) 10 (38.5) 27 (45.8) 0.285
 Voiding symptomsa) 26 (78.8) 18 (69.2) 44 (74.6) 0.353
 Catheterizationa) 4 (12.1) 11 (42.3) 15 (25.4) 0.012*
 Infectiona) 9 (27.3) 12 (52.2) 21 (35.6) 0.063
 Infection with fevera) 2 (6.1) 7 (26.9) 9 (15.3) 0.024*
Bowel symptomatology
 Constipationa) 21 (63.6) 16 (61.5) 37 (62.7) 0.977
 Anorectal dyscheziaa) 19 (57.6) 14 (53.8) 33 (56.0) 0.904
 Fecal incontinencea) 1 (3.0) 1 (3.84) 2 (3.4) 1.000
Sexual symptomatology
 Dyserectiona) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Dysejaculationa) 0 (0) 1 (3.84) 1 (1.7) 0.807
Urinary treatment
 Anticholinergica) 10 (30.3) 9 (34.6) 19 (32.2) 0.725
 Alpha adrenergic blocking druga) 10 (30.3) 6 (23.1) 16 (27.1) 0.535
 Botulinum toxina) 1 (3.0) 2 (7.7) 3 (5.1) 0.577

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).

LUTS, lower urinary tract symptoms; MS, multiple sclerosis; NMOSD, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder; EDSS, expended disabilty status scale; SUI, stress urinary incontinence; Anticholinergic, anticholinergic drug.

* P<0.05.

a) Fisher test.

b) Chi-square test.

c) Student t-test.

Table 2.
Comparison of urodynamic characteristics in the 2 population
Variable MS NMOSD Total P-value
Overactivity detrusorb) 16 (48.5) 12 (46.1) 28 0.663
Volume contraction detrusorc) 214.7 ± 153.8 190.8 ± 130.3 0.648
Cystometric capacityc) 367.4 ± 152.7 356.3 ± 140.4 0.783
Detrusor pressurec) 56.1 ± 33.3 54.6 ± 24.7 0.947
Low bladder compliancea) 0 (0) 4 (15.4) 4 0.016*
Detrusor sphincter dyssynergiaa) 22 (66.7) 10 (38.4) 32 0.118
Urinary retentiona) 19 (57.6) 11 (42.3) 30 0.433
Morphological complication 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 -

Values are presented as number (%) or mean±standard deviation.

MS, multiple sclerosis; NMOSD, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.

* P<0.05.

a) Fisher test.

b) Chi-square test.

c) Student t-test.



ARTICLE & ORGAN
Article Category

Browse all articles >

Organ

Browse all articles >

ISSUES
DISEASES & TOPICS
Diseases

Browse all articles >

Topics

Browse all articles >

AUTHOR
INFORMATION

Editorial Office
Department of Urology, Kangbuk Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine,
29 Saemunan-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03181, Korea
Tel: +82-2-2001-2237     Fax: +82-2-2001-2247    E-mail: choys1011@naver.com

Copyright © 2018 by Korean Continence Society. All rights reserved.

Powerd by M2community

Close layer
prev next